- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
html_content_en = """
"""
with open("blogger_article_en.html", "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
f.write(html_content_en)
Juridical Analysis of False Accusation and the Boundaries of Defamation Offenses Against Children from Underprivileged Families
The correlation between deviant behavior in children from affluent families—often incorrectly attributed to excessive material funding—and unilateral claims against children from underprivileged families raises serious legal issues. Within the framework of positive Indonesian law, making assumptions without empirical evidentiary basis that link economic status to morality can be categorized as a form of false accusation directly intersecting with defamation or slander offenses.
Regulatory Dimensions in Governing Law (The Criminal Code & ITE Law)
- Article 310 of the Criminal Code / Article 433 of Law No. 1 of 2023 (New Criminal Code): Regulates the offenses of insult or defamation, whether verbal or written. Attacking the honor or reputation of a group or individual without authorization so that it becomes known to the public constitutes a complaint-based criminal offense.
- Article 311 of the Criminal Code / Article 434 of Law No. 1 of 2023 (Slander): States that if the perpetrator commits defamation but cannot prove the truth of their allegations—and what was alleged is contrary to what they knew—the perpetrator is threatened with the criminal offense of slander carrying a heavier prison sentence (up to 4 years).
- Article 27A jo. Article 45 Paragraph (4) of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to the ITE Law: Imprisons anyone who intentionally attacks another person's honor or reputation by accusing them of something through electronic systems or digital media.
The Concept of False Accusation and the Fallacy of Causal Logic
In criminal law doctrine and criminology, false accusation refers to false allegations or the baseless attribution of fault to innocent parties. Attributing the criminality of wealthy children to "having too much money" and then drawing a generalized conclusion that children from disadvantaged families automatically "behave well because they lack money" is a form of reasoning fallacy (fallacy) that leads to the violation of other subjects' constitutional rights.
Criminality and social deviance cannot be reduced linearly to a single financial funding variable alone. Criminogenic factors such as family dysfunction, parenting, and social control are far more determinative than mere material quantity. Therefore, comparative claims that degrade children from underprivileged families—as if their morality were formed out of forced necessity due to poverty—not only fail sociologically but also fulfill the elements of attacking human dignity protected by law.
Civil Law Note: Perpetrators who spread this discriminatory narrative can be sued civilly on the grounds of an Unlawful Act (Perbuatan Melawan Hukum / PMH) based on Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) for causing immaterial losses in the form of social stigmatization against children from low-income backgrounds.
Comments