MAKE AND CONVERT "40 SAMPLES FROM THOSE 200 EXAMPLES PROVIDED-ALREADY" INTO "SEMANTIC-BREAKDOWN" OF EACH SENTENCES OF WORDS/WORDING THUS INTO "ASSIGNED" NUMERIC VALUES

SEMANTIC BREAKDOWN OF QUALITATIVE IMPACT

Purpose: The following 40 examples are selected from the previously developed 200 qualitative IMPACT examples. Each sentence is semantically decomposed into meaningful wording or semantic units and then assigned quantitative ordinal values.

IMPACT = SEVERITY + POSITION + DEPENDENCY + CONNECTIVITY + CONSEQUENCE

NUMERIC SEMANTIC SCALE

VALUE	SEMANTIC INTENSITY
1	Minimal / isolated / negligible
2	Low / limited / secondary
3	Moderate / noticeable
4	High / major / substantial
5	Very High / critical / central / systemic

01–20 — MINIMAL TO LOW IMPACT

#	ORIGINAL SENTENCE	SEMANTIC BREAKDOWN → ASSIGNED VALUE	S	P	D	C	K	TOTAL
1	A minor delay in a non-essential activity creates almost no noticeable effect on the overall system.	minor delay → S=1; non-essential activity → P=1; limited dependence → D=1; isolated activity → C=1; almost no noticeable effect → K=1.	1	1	1	1	1	5
2	A small documentation error affects only one low-priority record and is easily corrected.	small error → S=1; low-priority record → P=1; one record → D=1; isolated → C=1; easily corrected → K=2.	1	1	1	1	2	6
3	A temporary interruption in an optional process causes only a minor inconvenience.	temporary interruption → S=1; optional process → P=1; little dependency → D=1; localized → C=1; minor inconvenience → K=1.	1	1	1	1	1	5
4	A missing low-value input slightly reduces the efficiency of one isolated task.	missing low-value input → S=1; low-value → P=1; one task → D=1; isolated → C=1; slightly reduces efficiency → K=1.	1	1	1	1	1	5
5	A minor communication gap affects one activity without disturbing connected activities.	minor gap → S=1; one activity → P=1; limited dependency → D=1; connected activities unaffected → C=2; no disturbance → K=2.	1	1	1	2	2	7
6	A small scheduling error causes a brief delay in a secondary activity.	small error → S=1; secondary activity → P=2; limited dependency → D=1; localized → C=1; brief delay → K=2.	1	2	1	1	2	7
7	A minor equipment irregularity affects an auxiliary function but does not stop operations.	minor irregularity → S=1; auxiliary function → P=1; low dependency → D=1; limited connection → C=2; operations continue → K=2.	1	1	1	2	2	7
8	A low-priority task is completed late, but the main workflow continues normally.	late completion → S=1; low-priority task → P=1; low dependency → D=1; limited propagation → C=2; main workflow normal → K=2.	1	1	1	2	2	7
9	A small data inconsistency requires correction but does not affect important decisions.	small inconsistency → S=1; non-central data → P=1; limited dependency → D=2; limited connectivity → C=1; important decisions unaffected → K=2.	1	1	2	1	2	7
10	A minor resource shortage slightly reduces the performance of a peripheral activity.	minor shortage → S=1; peripheral activity → P=1; some dependency → D=2; limited connectivity → C=2; slight performance reduction → K=1.	1	1	2	2	1	7
11	A localized mistake creates a small rework requirement with no meaningful downstream effect.	localized mistake → S=1; local position → P=1; low dependency → D=1; limited connectivity → C=2; small rework/no downstream effect → K=2.	1	1	1	2	2	7
12	A minor interruption affects one supporting function while the primary process remains unaffected.	minor interruption → S=1; supporting function → P=1; low dependency → D=2; limited connection → C=2; primary process unaffected → K=2.	1	1	2	2	2	8
13	A low-level quality issue is detected early and corrected before propagation.	low-level issue → S=1; non-central quality point → P=1; limited dependency → D=2; propagation prevented → C=2; early correction → K=2.	1	1	2	2	2	8
14	A secondary communication channel becomes unavailable without affecting the main communication route.	unavailability → S=1; secondary channel → P=1; main route independent → D=1; secondary connection → C=3; main route unaffected → K=2.	1	1	1	3	2	8
15	A small inventory discrepancy requires checking but does not interrupt production.	small discrepancy → S=1; inventory position → P=2; production has limited dependency → D=2; limited connection → C=1; production uninterrupted → K=2.	1	2	2	1	2	8
16	A minor software malfunction affects an optional feature but leaves core functions operational.	minor malfunction → S=1; optional feature → P=1; core functions independent → D=1; feature connection → C=3; core operation intact → K=2.	1	1	1	3	2	8
17	A delayed approval slightly slows a peripheral activity without affecting the critical path.	delayed approval → S=1; peripheral activity → P=2; limited dependency → D=1; limited connection → C=2; critical path unaffected → K=2.	1	2	1	2	2	8
18	A minor procedural deviation requires correction but produces little operational consequence.	minor deviation → S=1; routine procedure → P=1; limited dependency → D=2; limited propagation → C=2; little consequence → K=2.	1	1	2	2	2	8
19	A small supplier delay affects a non-critical material with sufficient alternatives available.	small delay → S=1; non-critical material → P=1; alternative supply → D=2; limited connectivity → C=2; alternatives available → K=2.	1	1	2	2	2	8
20	A minor human error creates additional checking work but does not compromise the process.	minor error → S=1; routine position → P=1; limited dependency → D=2; limited propagation → C=2; process uncompromised → K=2.	1	1	2	2	2	8

21–40 — INCREASING SEMANTIC INTENSITY

#	ORIGINAL SENTENCE	SEMANTIC BREAKDOWN → ASSIGNED VALUE	S	P	D	C	K	TOTAL
21	A small network interruption affects only an isolated workstation.	small interruption → S=1; isolated workstation → P=1; minimal dependency → D=2; isolated → C=2; limited effect → K=2.	1	1	2	2	2	8
22	A minor scheduling conflict is resolved without affecting dependent operations.	minor conflict → S=1; routine scheduling position → P=1; dependent operations exist → D=1; limited propagation → C=3; resolved/no effect → K=2.	1	1	1	3	2	8
23	A small administrative omission creates limited corrective work.	small omission → S=1; administrative position → P=1; low dependency → D=2; limited connection → C=2; limited correction → K=2.	1	1	2	2	2	8
24	A low-priority component becomes temporarily unavailable while substitutes remain accessible.	temporary unavailability → S=1; low-priority component → P=2; substitutes reduce dependency → D=2; limited network role → C=2; substitutes available → K=2.	1	2	2	2	2	9
25	A minor operational disturbance produces a small localized consequence with rapid recovery.	minor disturbance → S=1; local operational position → P=2; limited dependency → D=2; localized → C=2; small consequence/rapid recovery → K=2.	1	2	2	2	2	9
26	A recurring documentation error begins to consume additional administrative resources.	recurring error → S=2; administrative position → P=1; resource dependency → D=2; repeated connection → C=2; additional resource consumption → K=2.	2	1	2	2	2	9
27	A delayed input begins to affect the timing of a secondary workflow.	delayed input → S=2; secondary workflow → P=1; workflow dependency → D=2; timing connection → C=2; timing affected → K=2.	2	1	2	2	2	9
28	A small equipment failure reduces the capacity of one supporting operation.	small failure → S=2; supporting operation → P=2; capacity dependency → D=2; one operation → C=2; capacity reduction → K=2.	2	2	2	2	2	10
29	A data-entry problem affects several related records but remains easily recoverable.	data-entry problem → S=2; record-level position → P=1; several records → D=2; related records → C=2; easily recoverable → K=2.	2	1	2	2	2	9
30	A minor process bottleneck begins to slow several downstream activities.	minor bottleneck → S=2; process position → P=2; downstream dependency → D=2; several activities → C=3; downstream slowing → K=2.	2	2	2	3	2	11
31	A recurring communication problem creates moderate coordination difficulties between two teams.	recurring problem → S=2; team coordination position → P=2; inter-team dependency → D=2; two-team connectivity → C=3; moderate coordination difficulty → K=2.	2	2	2	3	2	11
32	A delayed maintenance activity slightly reduces the reliability of an operational asset.	delayed maintenance → S=2; operational asset → P=2; asset dependency → D=2; maintenance linkage → C=2; reduced reliability → K=3.	2	2	2	2	3	11
33	A moderate inventory discrepancy requires reconciliation across multiple records.	moderate discrepancy → S=2; inventory position → P=2; multiple records depend on reconciliation → D=3; multiple-record connectivity → C=2; reconciliation required → K=2.	2	2	3	2	2	11
34	A staffing shortage increases workload across a small operational group.	shortage → S=2; operational group → P=2; staff dependency → D=3; group connectivity → C=2; increased workload → K=3.	2	2	3	2	3	12
35	A recurring software error begins affecting several users performing related tasks.	recurring error → S=2; software position → P=2; user dependency → D=2; several users → C=3; related tasks affected → K=3.	2	2	2	3	3	12
36	A supplier delay begins affecting production scheduling but alternative materials remain available.	supplier delay → S=2; production scheduling → P=2; material dependency → D=3; supplier-production connection → C=3; alternatives reduce consequence → K=2.	2	2	3	3	2	12
37	A weak control allows repeated small errors to pass into downstream processing.	repeated errors → S=2; control position → P=2; downstream dependency → D=3; propagation → C=3; errors enter downstream processing → K=3.	2	2	3	3	3	13
38	A localized equipment problem creates moderate delays in dependent activities.	equipment problem → S=2; equipment position → P=3; dependent activities → D=3; multiple connections → C=3; moderate delays → K=2.	2	3	3	3	2	13
39	A communication failure causes several teams to repeat or revise their work.	communication failure → S=2; coordination position → P=2; team dependency → D=3; several teams → C=4; rework/revision → K=3.	2	2	3	4	3	14
40	A moderate data-quality problem begins influencing routine operational decisions.	moderate problem → S=2; decision-support position → P=2; decisions depend on data → D=3; operational connectivity → C=3; decisions influenced → K=3.	2	2	3	3	3	13

SEMANTIC MAPPING LOGIC

DIMENSION	LOW-INTENSITY WORDING	MODERATE WORDING	HIGH-INTENSITY WORDING
SEVERITY	minor / small / slight	moderate / noticeable	major / severe / critical
POSITION	isolated / peripheral / optional	operational / key	central / critical / strategic
DEPENDENCY	independent / limited	related / dependent	highly dependent / single-point dependency
CONNECTIVITY	isolated / one activity	several activities / multiple teams	highly connected / network-wide
CONSEQUENCE	almost no effect / minor inconvenience	noticeable disruption	substantial / cascading / systemic consequence

SEMANTIC TRANSFORMATION PROCESS

1. SENTENCE → Natural-language description of an impact.

2.