Utk yg mo Bantu2 Keuangan saya..monggo ke Bank Central Asia BCA 5520166779 a.n. Andreas Tparlaungan Manurung (Indonesia) For those who would like to help support my finances ..please feel free to send it to Bank Central Asia (BCA) account number 5520166779 under the name Andreas Tparlaungan Manurung (Indonesia)

Audit Evidence Attributes for Access Control (Key Control Evaluation)

Beyond Sufficient, Appropriate, and Competent Evidence

Yes. Although Sufficient, Appropriate, and Competent are the most widely recognized characteristics of audit evidence, they are not the only attributes discussed in auditing, internal control, information security, and digital forensics.

Various professional standards and frameworks describe additional characteristics that strengthen the quality, reliability, and defensibility of audit evidence.

Primary Audit Evidence Attributes

Attribute	Meaning	Common Reference
Sufficient	Adequate quantity of evidence.	ISA, GAAS
Appropriate	Relevant and reliable evidence.	ISA, GAAS
Competent	Credible, trustworthy, and obtained from dependable sources.	Traditional Auditing, ISACA
Relevant	Directly supports the audit objective.	ISA, IIA
Reliable	Accurate, dependable, and unbiased.	ISA, COSO
Valid	Measures or proves what it is intended to measure.	Research, Forensics
Authentic	Genuine and not altered.	Digital Forensics
Verifiable	Can be independently confirmed.	ISACA, ISO
Objective	Free from personal bias.	IIA, ISACA
Complete	Contains all required information.	ISO 27001
Consistent	Produces consistent conclusions.	Quality Assurance
Timely (Current)	Relates to the relevant audit period.	ISA, ISO
Accurate	Correct and free from material error.	COSO, ISO
Traceable	Can be linked to its original source.	ISO 27001, Digital Forensics
Corroborated	Supported by multiple independent sources.	Audit Methodology

Hierarchy of Audit Evidence Attributes

1. Sufficient (Quantity of Evidence)
2. Appropriate (Overall Quality)
   • Relevant
   • Reliable
3. Competent (Credibility)
   • Authentic
   • Verifiable
   • Objective
   • Accurate

Comprehensive Statement for Access Control

Audit evidence supporting Access Control (Key Control Evaluation) should be sufficient, appropriate, competent, relevant, reliable, authentic, verifiable, objective, complete, timely, and corroborated to provide a sound basis for evaluating the effectiveness of Segregation of Duties (SoD) controls.

Practical "10-C" Audit Evidence Framework

1. Sufficient
2. Appropriate
3. Competent
4. Complete
5. Consistent
6. Credible
7. Current (Timely)
8. Corroborated
9. Correct (Accurate)
10. Confirmable (Verifiable)

Key Takeaway

Modern auditing standards primarily emphasize Sufficient and Appropriate audit evidence. The concept of Competent remains widely recognized in auditing practice and professional education as an important indicator of evidence credibility. The remaining attributes generally serve as supporting qualities that strengthen or define what makes evidence appropriate and competent.